Let us answer the question in the headline immediately, because most pages that ask it never quite do. In the great majority of Western Massachusetts, no, you cannot live here without a car. There are 10 towns where it is genuinely practical, they are all specific, and this is what separates them from everywhere else.
Start with the number that settles the argument. The EPA scores neighbourhood walkability from 1 to 20 and publishes four bands for the result. Across the 93 towns here the index covers, not one lands in the top band. 50 of them fall in the bottom band, "least walkable". The regional median score is 5.5, which is also in the bottom band.
The Bus Map Is Emptier Than People Think
Between the 3 regional transit authorities that operate here, covering the Pioneer Valley, the Berkshires and Franklin County, the region has 2,280 fixed-route bus stops. That sounds like a network until you see how it is distributed.
49 of the 101 towns have no fixed-route bus stop at all. Not a reduced service or an infrequent one. None. All three authorities' published schedules were checked, so that zero is a finding rather than a gap in our data. Of the 52 towns that do have service, Springfield alone holds 772 stops, which is 34% of every stop in the region.
So the honest shape of transit here is one city with a real bus network, a handful of towns with a usable corridor, a scattering of towns with a route that passes through a few times a day, and half the region with nothing. A town appearing in the served column with seven stops is on a line, not in a network, and the difference decides whether you can get to work without owning a vehicle.
Where It Actually Works
Combine the two, an above-average walkability score and real fixed-route service, and the list of places where a car-free life is genuinely practical comes to 10:
- Springfield: index 13.4, 772 bus stops
- Holyoke: index 13.2, 159 bus stops
- Amherst: index 12.7, 134 bus stops
- Chicopee: index 12.6, 160 bus stops
- Great Barrington: index 11.5, 30 bus stops
- Northampton: index 11.2, 124 bus stops
- Pittsfield: index 11.1, 83 bus stops
- Greenfield: index 10.9, 70 bus stops
- Longmeadow: index 10.8, 32 bus stops
- West Springfield: index 10.7, 110 bus stops
Note what these have in common and what they do not. They are not the region's wealthiest towns and several are not its most desirable by any conventional read. They are the places built before the car, on a grid, at a density that predates zoning, and they mostly kept it. A dense old street pattern is the thing that makes walking work, and no amount of newer investment substitutes for it.
The college towns deserve a caveat here, because their scores are propped up by student populations living at densities the rest of the town does not share, and by university shuttle service that is free at the point of use and runs on the academic year. Wonderful if you are part of that. Less relevant if you are buying a house two miles out and working in January.
What The Index Does Not Capture
Three things, and each one has caught somebody out.
- Winter. The index measures street pattern and density, not whether the pavement is cleared in February. In much of this region snow clearance on footways is the abutting owner's responsibility and enforcement is light. A walkable summer street can be genuinely impassable for weeks. Our figures on how much snow actually falls here are worth reading beside this.
- Terrain. Flat walkability and hill walkability are the same number to the EPA. They are not the same walk, and a good deal of this region is not flat.
- Where the jobs are. Walkable to a shop is not walkable to work. If your employer is on a business park at the edge of a different town, a high score at home does not help you, and the region's largest employers are mostly not in its most walkable places.
Every Town The Index Scores
Sortable and filterable. Read the two columns together: a decent score with zero stops means a pleasant place to walk within your own neighbourhood and no way out of it without driving.
Walkability Index and Fixed-Route Bus Stops by Town
Download CSV, same columns, same definitions
The EPA National Walkability Index averaged across each town's block groups, with the town's fixed-route bus stop count from the three regional authorities' published schedules. The index scores 93 of the 101 towns; the smallest have no block group in the federal database.
| Town | County | Walkability Index | Band | Bus Stops |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Springfield | Hampden | 13.4 | Above Average | 772 |
| Holyoke | Hampden | 13.2 | Above Average | 159 |
| Amherst | Hampshire | 12.7 | Above Average | 134 |
| Chicopee | Hampden | 12.6 | Above Average | 160 |
| Great Barrington | Berkshire | 11.5 | Above Average | 30 |
| Northampton | Hampshire | 11.2 | Above Average | 124 |
| Pittsfield | Berkshire | 11.1 | Above Average | 83 |
| Greenfield | Franklin | 10.9 | Above Average | 70 |
| Longmeadow | Hampden | 10.8 | Above Average | 32 |
| West Springfield | Hampden | 10.7 | Above Average | 110 |
| North Adams | Berkshire | 10.5 | Below Average | 18 |
| Westfield | Hampden | 10.2 | Below Average | 57 |
| Lee | Berkshire | 10.0 | Below Average | 8 |
| Shelburne | Franklin | 9.8 | Below Average | 11 |
| Williamstown | Berkshire | 9.5 | Below Average | 13 |
| Hadley | Hampshire | 9.4 | Below Average | 28 |
| South Hadley | Hampshire | 9.2 | Below Average | 30 |
| Stockbridge | Berkshire | 9.2 | Below Average | 4 |
| Dalton | Berkshire | 9.2 | Below Average | 13 |
| Easthampton | Hampshire | 9.1 | Below Average | 43 |
| Adams | Berkshire | 9.1 | Below Average | 7 |
| Agawam | Hampden | 9.0 | Below Average | 56 |
| Buckland | Franklin | 8.9 | Below Average | 1 |
| Montague | Franklin | 8.6 | Below Average | 42 |
| Orange | Franklin | 8.6 | Below Average | 19 |
| Gill | Franklin | 8.4 | Below Average | 0 |
| Lenox | Berkshire | 8.4 | Below Average | 8 |
| East Longmeadow | Hampden | 8.3 | Below Average | 18 |
| Cheshire | Berkshire | 8.3 | Below Average | 4 |
| Williamsburg | Hampshire | 8.1 | Below Average | 12 |
| Deerfield | Franklin | 7.9 | Below Average | 26 |
| Ludlow | Hampden | 7.9 | Below Average | 30 |
| Sunderland | Franklin | 7.5 | Below Average | 18 |
| Hinsdale | Berkshire | 7.4 | Below Average | 1 |
| Belchertown | Hampshire | 6.7 | Below Average | 33 |
| Southwick | Hampden | 6.5 | Below Average | 7 |
| Ware | Hampshire | 6.4 | Below Average | 8 |
| Palmer | Hampden | 6.3 | Below Average | 12 |
| Hatfield | Hampshire | 6.0 | Below Average | 11 |
| Otis | Berkshire | 6.0 | Below Average | 0 |
| Lanesborough | Berkshire | 5.9 | Below Average | 5 |
| Goshen | Hampshire | 5.8 | Below Average | 2 |
| Sheffield | Berkshire | 5.8 | Below Average | 0 |
| Hampden | Hampden | 5.7 | Least Walkable | 0 |
| Wilbraham | Hampden | 5.6 | Least Walkable | 3 |
| West Stockbridge | Berkshire | 5.5 | Least Walkable | 0 |
| Egremont | Berkshire | 5.5 | Least Walkable | 0 |
| Becket | Berkshire | 5.5 | Least Walkable | 0 |
| Granby | Hampshire | 5.4 | Least Walkable | 9 |
| Hancock | Berkshire | 5.3 | Least Walkable | 0 |
| Huntington | Hampshire | 5.2 | Least Walkable | 0 |
| Charlemont | Franklin | 5.2 | Least Walkable | 8 |
| Monson | Hampden | 5.1 | Least Walkable | 0 |
| Southampton | Hampshire | 5.1 | Least Walkable | 13 |
| Wales | Hampden | 5.0 | Least Walkable | 0 |
| Bernardston | Franklin | 4.8 | Least Walkable | 0 |
| New Ashford | Berkshire | 4.8 | Least Walkable | 0 |
| Conway | Franklin | 4.8 | Least Walkable | 0 |
| Leverett | Franklin | 4.7 | Least Walkable | 0 |
| Granville | Hampden | 4.7 | Least Walkable | 0 |
| Westhampton | Hampshire | 4.7 | Least Walkable | 0 |
| New Marlborough | Berkshire | 4.6 | Least Walkable | 0 |
| Holland | Hampden | 4.5 | Least Walkable | 0 |
| Florida | Berkshire | 4.5 | Least Walkable | 0 |
| Cummington | Hampshire | 4.5 | Least Walkable | 4 |
| Middlefield | Hampshire | 4.5 | Least Walkable | 0 |
| Northfield | Franklin | 4.4 | Least Walkable | 0 |
| Ashfield | Franklin | 4.3 | Least Walkable | 2 |
| Brimfield | Hampden | 4.3 | Least Walkable | 0 |
| Tolland | Hampden | 4.3 | Least Walkable | 0 |
| Monterey | Berkshire | 4.3 | Least Walkable | 0 |
| Leyden | Franklin | 4.3 | Least Walkable | 0 |
| Erving | Franklin | 4.3 | Least Walkable | 3 |
| Pelham | Hampshire | 4.2 | Least Walkable | 3 |
| Richmond | Berkshire | 4.1 | Least Walkable | 0 |
| Washington | Berkshire | 4.0 | Least Walkable | 0 |
| Alford | Berkshire | 4.0 | Least Walkable | 0 |
| Russell | Hampden | 4.0 | Least Walkable | 0 |
| Chesterfield | Hampshire | 4.0 | Least Walkable | 0 |
| Blandford | Hampden | 3.8 | Least Walkable | 0 |
| Wendell | Franklin | 3.8 | Least Walkable | 0 |
| New Salem | Franklin | 3.5 | Least Walkable | 0 |
| Shutesbury | Franklin | 3.3 | Least Walkable | 0 |
| Colrain | Franklin | 3.2 | Least Walkable | 0 |
| Peru | Berkshire | 3.2 | Least Walkable | 0 |
| Whately | Franklin | 3.2 | Least Walkable | 8 |
| Plainfield | Hampshire | 3.2 | Least Walkable | 2 |
| Chester | Hampden | 3.0 | Least Walkable | 0 |
| Clarksburg | Berkshire | 2.9 | Least Walkable | 0 |
| Windsor | Berkshire | 2.3 | Least Walkable | 4 |
| Montgomery | Hampden | 2.2 | Least Walkable | 0 |
| Tyringham | Berkshire | 1.8 | Least Walkable | 0 |
| Savoy | Berkshire | 1.5 | Least Walkable | 2 |
What These Columns Mean
- Town
- The municipality. Towns the federal index does not score are not listed.
- County
- One of the four western counties.
- Walkability Index
- The EPA National Walkability Index, 1 to 20, averaged across the town's block groups and weighted by population. Higher is more walkable. A town summary, not a promise about any single street.
- Band
- The EPA's own published bands for that score.
- Bus Stops
- Fixed-route bus stops inside the town boundary, from the three regional authorities' own published schedules. Zero is a checked fact. Dial-a-ride and paratransit do not appear in fixed-route schedules.
Cite: RE413. “Walkability Index and Fixed-Route Bus Stops by Town.” Updated August 5, 2026. https://www.re413.com/news/living-without-a-car-western-mass/, underlying sources at https://www.re413.com/sources/.
The Practical Answer
If going car-free is a requirement rather than a preference, the list above is your search area and it is short. Buy inside the old street grid, not on the edge of the town that contains it, and check the actual timetable for the actual stop rather than the presence of a route on a map.
If it is a preference, the more realistic goal in this region is one car rather than none, and that is achievable in considerably more places. The question then becomes how far the second driver would have to go, which is a commute question rather than a walkability one, and how the drive times here actually work covers it. For a specific street rather than a town average, look the address up: what sits within walking distance of a particular point is a different question from what a town scores on average, and it is the one that decides your mornings.
Sources
- U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, National Walkability Index. Block-group walkability scores rolled up to towns and weighted by population, with the agency's own published bands.
- Pioneer Valley, Berkshire and Franklin Regional Transit Authorities. Fixed-route bus stops and the routes serving them, from each authority's own published schedule.
"Figures through" is the period the publisher's data describes; "checked" is only when we last asked. The full sourcing: sources and method.