Eight miles apart, both with a college at the centre, both with a bookshop and a farmers market and a reputation. People moving to the Pioneer Valley routinely treat Amherst and Northampton as the same decision with two names. On the numbers they are not close, and the largest single difference is one almost nobody checks first.
A median single-family home in Amherst carries an annual property tax bill of $9,304. In Northampton the equivalent is $7,060. That is $2,244 a year, every year, between two towns you could cycle between before lunch.
Where That Gap Comes From
Two things drive it and they compound. Amherst's residential rate is $16.91 against Northampton's $13.67, and Amherst's median home is assessed higher as well, at $537,100 against $504,350. A higher rate applied to a higher assessment produces a bill gap larger than either difference on its own.
The underlying cause is a tax base problem specific to college towns, and Amherst has it worse. A large university is exempt from property tax, and it also occupies a great deal of land and houses a great many people who use municipal services. The town has to fund itself from what is left, which in practice is the residential roll.
Northampton has a college too, but it also has a genuine commercial downtown, a hospital and a broader base of taxable non-residential property to spread the levy across. How state aid and the tax base interact explains the mechanism generally; this is the clearest two-town illustration of it in the region.
The Housing Is Genuinely Different
Not just priced differently. Built differently.
Northampton's median single-family home was built in 1954 on 0.34 acres, at 1,636 square feet. Amherst's was built in 1968 on 0.58 acres, at 1,818.
So Amherst is the newer, larger house on the larger lot, and Northampton is the older, smaller house on the tighter one. That is the difference between a town that did most of its residential building after the war and one whose core was substantially built before it. Which you prefer is a matter of taste and of how you feel about what an older house here tends to hide, but they are not interchangeable products.
The walkability figures say the same thing from another angle: Amherst scores 12.7 against Northampton's 11.2, both in the federal index's above-average band and both among the highest in the region, which we go through in where a car-free life actually works. These are two of the very few places in Western Massachusetts where that is a real option.
Renting Is A Different Story In Each
This is where the two towns diverge most sharply and where the student population shows up in the data.
Amherst has 4,439 renting households, of which 65.9% spend thirty percent or more of income on housing. Northampton has 5,153, at 54.2%.
A large share of Amherst's renters are students, whose reported income does not resemble a household income, so that figure overstates hardship in a specific and well-understood way. It also, more usefully, tells you what the rental market is like to compete in. A town where a university's intake resets the demand curve every September is a difficult place to rent an ordinary flat on an ordinary schedule, and the federal rent figures for this area are the highest in the region for exactly that reason.
Side By Side
Every figure below comes from the same source the two town pages render, so you can follow any row back to its record.
Amherst and Northampton Compared
Download CSV, same columns, same definitions
Public-record figures for both towns from the same sources their own pages use: assessment rolls, the Division of Local Services tax rate certification, the census, and the federal walkability and commuting series. Assessments are for taxation and lag the market. Cost-burden figures are survey estimates with margins of error, not counts.
| Measure | Amherst | Northampton |
|---|---|---|
| Population, 2020 Census | 39,263 | 29,571 |
| Residential Tax Rate | $16.91 | $13.67 |
| Median Single-Family Assessment | $537,100 | $504,350 |
| Annual Tax on That Home | $9,304 | $7,060 |
| Preservation Surcharge | 3% | 3% |
| Single-Family Homes | 4,119 | 5,784 |
| Median Living Area | 1,818 sq ft | 1,636 sq ft |
| Median Lot | 0.58 acres | 0.34 acres |
| Median Year Built | 1,968 | 1,954 |
| Walkability Index | 12.7 | 11.2 |
| Mean Commute | 19 min | 21.6 min |
| Work in Their Own Town | 27.7% | 33.8% |
| Renter Households | 4,439 | 5,153 |
| Renters Cost-Burdened | 65.9% | 54.2% |
| Owners Cost-Burdened | 23.9% | 22.6% |
| Annual Snowfall | 36.5 in | 36.5 in |
What These Columns Mean
- Measure
- The figure being compared. Every one comes from the same source both town pages use.
- Amherst
- The figure for Amherst.
- Northampton
- The figure for Northampton.
Cite: RE413. “Amherst and Northampton Compared.” Updated August 5, 2026. https://www.re413.com/news/amherst-vs-northampton/, underlying sources at https://www.re413.com/sources/.
How To Choose Between Them
We are not going to tell you which is better, because the honest answer depends entirely on what you want and there is no defensible ranking to give. What the numbers do support is a short list of questions where the two towns genuinely differ:
- Can you carry the tax difference? $2,244 a year is roughly $187 a month, and it compounds over a thirty-year hold into a substantial figure. It is also invisible in a mortgage pre-approval. The calculator runs it for a real price rather than a median.
- Do you want the older house or the bigger lot? The two towns answer that question differently by default, and fighting the local grain is expensive.
- Are you renting first? If so the September cycle in Amherst is a real constraint on timing, and Northampton's market is less tied to it.
- Where is the work? Neither town keeps most of its own residents employed inside it, and the commuting map matters more than the eight miles between them suggests.
For anything narrower than a town median, look the actual address up. Within either town the variation between a street near the centre and one three miles out is larger than the variation between the two towns' medians, and that is true of almost every comparison of this kind.
Sources
- Massachusetts Department of Revenue, Division of Local Services. Certified residential tax rates and the Community Preservation surcharge for both towns.
- MassGIS standardized assessors' parcels. Median assessed value, living area, lot size and year built for single-family homes in both towns.
- U.S. Census Bureau. Population, commuting time, housing cost burden and the share of residents working in their own town.
- U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, National Walkability Index. Block-group walkability scores rolled up to each town.
"Figures through" is the period the publisher's data describes; "checked" is only when we last asked. The full sourcing: sources and method.